Photovoltaics, Cip6, nuclear, and the weight of the GSE bill
confirms the impressive numbers on photovoltaics and the Authority 's Energy attacks incentives for renewable energy for their weight in the bill. But little is said about aid to other sources that cost us just as dirty and the risk that the return to nuclear power we can get a new blow.
Controversy over the weight of the incentives to renewable electricity and intersects with the numbers of PV. In the past few weeks had spread GSE impressive data on photovoltaic systems that 2010 rates will be entitled to under the law "Alcoa Save: 55 thousand requests for about 4,000 MW. They were followed the objections of groups that the numbers were inflated by the Manager requests and therefore false harbingers of unnecessary scaremongering. Second Assosolare actually in 2010 would not have installed more than 1.5 GW (Qualenergia.it, Assosolare: estimates are exaggerated GSE), also Aper, Fiper Gifi and called for caution and double check your estimates. The day before yesterday, however, the GSE essentially confirmed the numbers (54 106 plants, a declared total power of 3771 MW, see attached tables).
figures, which could also increase as there is time to send applications for admission to the incentives in 2010 until the end of February, but will also skimmed through the controls that the GSE is working, those practices and false speculation, which falsely claimed to have finished its work by December 31, 2010. What will be the final word we'll know just numbers for many months, but meanwhile the data GSE threw gasoline on the fire of debate on the weight of the incentives for renewables. The controversy took a new impetus in recent days by submitting to the Government's report on the state of the energy market by the Authority Electricity and Gas (see attachment).
incentives, says the document, provide a comprehensive collection that has grown from € 2.5 billion in 2009 to 3.4 in 2010, while in 2011 it could reach 5.7 billion total (see chart). In explaining the numbers, the GSE suggested to review, in fact, the incentive system "to mitigate the impact that these costs result in bills of households and businesses the incentives and make more efficient," putting in the dock above the photovoltaic and CIP6/92.
have not had to wait for reactions from environmentalists. Greenpeace, WWF and Legambiente in a joint statement expressing "Grave concern about an attack that calls into question the achievement of European objectives for 2020." The Authority, point out the associations, it ignores the macroeconomic impact of development and employment of renewable "means that the higher costs have positive net effects, as well as the environment, including the economy (23 to 27 billion € to 2020 according to the study IREX 2010). It then notes as well as Europe has clearly indicated that the cost of renewables has to be borne by consumers of energy and taxation, to avoid stop and go effect.
And then he points out that a far greater weight on the bills could have the atom, especially for that item 17 of Legislative Decree 31/2010 which stipulates that those who build power plants will be repaid in case of delays in implementation of the systems being independent. "For two EPR reactors located at a site, such coverage could result in charges of up to several billion euro. A waste of money. Also - read the press - because the authorities do not share data on what the taxpayer has paid to date for the Italian Nuclear? The costs of the past still weigh on our bill, but that does not offend the Authority, and to our knowledge amounted to approximately EUR 400 million a year. "
Then go and watch the weight on our bills have incentives and other dirty sources costs on the other hand is always instructive (QualEnergia, That dark side of the electricity bill). On a bill of about € 16.4 of 31 425 connected to the "general expenses" are to pay for nuclear or conventional energy (eg through the CIP 6 refineries) or special conditions of supply (such as a discount to 120 large interruptible customers for the service). The rest, 15 €, allows us to support the start of development of renewable sources.
At the country level we find, looking at the report of the Authority, in 2009 nuclear interruptability assimilated and have cost approximately € 2.24 billion, compared with € 2.1 billion for contributions to renewables.
Source www.qualenergia.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment